Create Your First Project

Start adding your projects to your portfolio. Click on "Manage Projects" to get started

.pro-gallery-wix-wrapper {display: block !important;} .pro-gallery-wix-wrapper .gallery-item-container {opacity: 1 !important; display: block !important;}

BTC Tech

Project

1. Role: Product Lead (Design & Engineering Oversight)
2. Organization: BTC (Product & Technology Group)
3. Products: E-commerce, retail platforms, and digital services (consumer-facing & internal systems)
4. Scope: Cross-functional leadership of ~20 people across product, UX, and engineering

Context

BTC operated across multiple digital products spanning retail, e-commerce, and platform services, serving both customer-facing journeys and internal operational systems. The environment was commercially driven, fast-moving, and later impacted by major external disruption during the COVID era.

I joined in a product leadership role spanning product strategy, UX direction, and engineering execution. My focus was to stabilize delivery, reduce organizational friction, and rebuild product coherence under tight constraints, without introducing heavy process or slowing momentum.

The challenge

The core challenge wasn’t isolated UX issues. It was organizational and product fragility.

Key issues included:

• Fragmented product ownership and unclear priorities
• UX, engineering, and business operating in silos
• Inconsistent experience quality across products,
• Delivery pressure amplified by disruption
• Limited runway for experimentation, rework, or long discovery cycles

The risk wasn’t just a degraded user experience, it was delivery failure, stagnation, and operational drag.

Insight that reframed the work

The biggest UX problems were symptoms of unclear product strategy and fragmented ownership, not a lack of design effort.

So the work shifted from “fix UX” to fixing the operating system: decision rights, prioritization, alignment, and execution discipline.

Approach (stabilize first, improve second)

I implemented a lightweight leadership and delivery model focused on clarity and throughput:

1. Decision rights and ownership

• Clarified who owns what (products, journeys, KPIs) and how decisions get made.
• Established a consistent cadence for prioritization and escalation to reduce blocking.

2. Portfolio prioritization under constraints

• Created a single priority stack tied to commercial impact, feasibility, and operational risk.
• Reduced noise by cutting peripheral initiatives and focusing on core journeys.

3. Cross-functional alignment

• Aligned UX, engineering, and business around shared goals and definitions of success.
• Improved handoff quality by aligning earlier on constraints, dependencies, and acceptance criteria.

4. Standardization to reduce cognitive and technical debt

• Introduced shared experience principles and reusable patterns across products.
• Reduced inconsistency and duplicated effort across teams and surfaces.

Product and design outcomes (tangible changes)

Rather than redesigning everything, we targeted leverage points:

• Core journey focus: prioritized end-to-end paths that drive conversion, retention, and operational efficiency over peripheral features.
• Pattern unification: standardized UX behaviors across products (navigation logic, forms, cards, checkout/payment states, error and empty states, account flows) to raise baseline quality and reduce implementation variance.
• MVP delivery with feedback loops: shipped smaller, testable increments to validate direction quickly and avoid expensive reversals during instability.

Fidelity was used strategically, low-fidelity flows and system diagrams aligned stakeholders quickly during stabilization, while high-fidelity UI specifications were produced for standardized patterns and the highest-traffic journeys where consistency and interaction detail materially affect delivery quality and user trust.

Deliverables (execution-focused)

• Portfolio roadmap and a single shared priority stack
• Product goals and success metrics per journey
• Experience principles and pattern guidelines to standardize UX across products
• Flow maps and system diagrams to surface dependencies and unblock engineering
• Delivery plans bridging design and engineering with clear acceptance criteria
• Leadership communication artifacts to keep decision-making stable during disruption

Impact

• Improved delivery focus and reduced cross-team friction through clarified ownership, decision cadence, and shared priorities.
• Increased experience consistency across products through standardized patterns and unified UX rules.
• Strengthened execution resilience during external disruption by shifting from reactive shipping to intentional, prioritized delivery.

Not every initiative reached full maturity given constraints and disruption, but the organization moved from fragmented output to coordinated execution with clearer product direction.

Reflection

This work reinforced that UX impact scales with leadership clarity. Design excellence alone cannot compensate for unclear priorities, weak decision rights, or low trust across functions. In high-pressure environments, the most valuable contribution is often creating the conditions for teams to make better decisions and ship reliably.

NDA note

Details and visuals are simplified or reconstructed to preserve confidentiality while reflecting real leadership decisions, product direction, and execution patterns.